Attention Capital | A Weekly Column by Josh Stein - Part Two: The Wrong WrapperAttention Capital | A Weekly Column by Josh Stein - Part One: The Largest Attention Allocator in the WorldThe New Reality for Cord-Cutters: Plex Overhauls Premium Tier PricingThis Week's StreamScoop Streaming TV GuideCalifornia's Streaming Ad Volume Law Upends Agency PlaybooksThe End of Loud Streaming Ads: How California's SB 576 Reshapes National MediaState of Streaming Presents: Attention Capital | A Column by Josh Stein - WWE Rights Stack (Part Two)SOS. ExclusiveAre You My Mother? Comcast Just Cut Peacock Loose - Here's Who Buys It.The Pre-Validated Screen: Streamers Trade Reality Dating for BookTok IPComcast Just Broke Up With Its Own Business Model. Here's Why Your Streaming Budget Should Care.State of Streaming Presents: Attention Capital | A Column by Josh Stein - WWE Rights Stack (Part One)This Week's StreamScoop Streaming TV GuideBeyond the Follower Count: The 'Social-to-Theatrical' Pipeline Saving the Box OfficeGaming the Front of the Line: A New State of Streaming Contributor Enters the ChatSports Teams Have Been Giving Away Their Most Valuable Asset. Kiswe Is Helping Them Take It Back.Attention Capital | A Weekly Column by Josh Stein - Part Two: The Wrong WrapperAttention Capital | A Weekly Column by Josh Stein - Part One: The Largest Attention Allocator in the WorldThe New Reality for Cord-Cutters: Plex Overhauls Premium Tier PricingThis Week's StreamScoop Streaming TV GuideCalifornia's Streaming Ad Volume Law Upends Agency PlaybooksThe End of Loud Streaming Ads: How California's SB 576 Reshapes National MediaState of Streaming Presents: Attention Capital | A Column by Josh Stein - WWE Rights Stack (Part Two)SOS. ExclusiveAre You My Mother? Comcast Just Cut Peacock Loose - Here's Who Buys It.The Pre-Validated Screen: Streamers Trade Reality Dating for BookTok IPComcast Just Broke Up With Its Own Business Model. Here's Why Your Streaming Budget Should Care.State of Streaming Presents: Attention Capital | A Column by Josh Stein - WWE Rights Stack (Part One)This Week's StreamScoop Streaming TV GuideBeyond the Follower Count: The 'Social-to-Theatrical' Pipeline Saving the Box OfficeGaming the Front of the Line: A New State of Streaming Contributor Enters the ChatSports Teams Have Been Giving Away Their Most Valuable Asset. Kiswe Is Helping Them Take It Back.
Measurement

The $1,500 Problem: Our Case to the FCC on Live Sports Access

TR
Tim Rowe
Mar 20261 min read
The $1,500 Problem: Our Case to the FCC on Live Sports Access

On March 26, 2026, State of Streaming submitted formal comments to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in response to its inquiry into the state of live sports broadcasting and distribution (MB Docket No. 26-45).

We kept the filing deliberately lean. You won't find a wall of industry citations or a bibliography designed to signal expertise. That an intentional design and wonderfully executed by our Editorial Lead, Nicholas Cardoso.

Regulatory comments work best when they clarify a problem rather than perform authority. The FCC asked a direct question — how is the migration of live sports to streaming platforms affecting the public interest? — and we wanted to answer it directly. Census data on internet access. Consumer research on subscription fatigue. The math on what it actually costs a household to watch its home team. Nothing speculative, nothing we couldn't tie to a specific, verifiable number.

We also chose plain language over legal convention. These comments aren't written for telecom lawyers. They're written for the record — and for the fans, local broadcasters, and policymakers who need the problem stated cleanly enough to act on. Objectivity here is a utility. The moment advocacy sounds like advocacy, the reader's filter goes up. We'd rather the data do the arguing.

The full filing can be read below comments are due today.

FCC Comments: Live Sports Broadcasting (MB Docket No. 26-45)

Get the SOS. Brief

The sharpest streaming intelligence, delivered to your inbox.